Barriers and enablers in the health of shared resources

How to sustain community contributions to resources (documentation, curricula etc.)

ENABLERS

• champions entry points at different levels of experience
• examples and tutorials
• resources and stories
• translations contributed via github
• collective iteration / updatable
• trust/power building
• common standard - word
• shared experience
• open license
• creative commons
• feedback form on each page
• archived materials
• agreed formats
• outline/resource
• agreed forms (outline, resource)
• co-create and develop leaders
• innovative satisfaction of personal need
• 1-on-1s
• personal relationships
• enable people to continue conversation exchange thru discussion platform
• after online event
• enable learners to monitor eachothers’ classwork via google slides
• negotiation tactics

BARRIERS

• misaligned incentives
• staff/nonstaff divide
• fear uncertainty doubt
• content needs legal and technical review
• github and other technical public spaces
• only approved editors can submit edits
• vetting
• versioning
• convoluted technical processes
• conceptual buy-in vs. practices
• limited capacity to review translations
• too many tools unsure where to contribute what
• lack of clear narrow vision
• language localization
• education level
• languages and communication styles
• different centers of reference
• editing
• people unwilling to learn new tools; default to old tools
• formats offline/ online

Annotation tool: hypothesis

Is git a barrier or enabler?

BEST PRACTICES

• Shared purpose
• teams and tasks
• clear roles and responsibilities
• activation guides
• etherpad? good notetaking to capture decisions
• good leadership/mentors
• community manager: be clear what you’re asking people;
• directed asks
• gamification?
• Fabrication: task management. Award tokens to people
• Metrics; [[Category: Resource Creation