What is up with Online Identity?

From DevSummit
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
- single sign-on options becoming very common (facebook, twitter, google, linkedin), and are even used by ideological opponents because of the benefits of social graphs
- "being able to walk down a city street anonymously is on the verge of disappearing" --even offline identity will soon be tracked
- Google, Facebook, other social networks (not Twitter) strongly enforce use of "real names" in the US, but care less for users outside of US (no universal concept of a real name, also less monetary motives for enforcing outside of US)
- OpenID -- failed attempt at single sign-on with more privacy options/permissions than facebook connect etc (doesn't allow for social graphs)
- do people even want to control these permissions? doesn't seem like this.... (tradeoffs for privacy v. convenience-- convenience wins every time)
- nonprofits fighting this (pretty much all on defensive rather than offensive) EFF (legal side) & Mozilla (software side), EPIC
- Ghostery = great firefox add-on that blocks all third party resources when loading pages
- nonprofits can use same tactics ad companies use against their corporate opponents (playing dirty but it works!)
- no real way to erase your online identity (even if you delete your facebook account, your info is just marked as deleted, not actually deleted)
- history of humanity up to 2003 stored same amount of data that we store every 48 hours
- content industries spend way more on lobbying than high tech industries, thus the current Protect ID act and SOPA (potential to "kill" the internet) -- interestingly Protect ID supported by more democrats than republicans, and most big tech corporations (google, ebay, twitter, facebook, etc) have signed letter against this