Performance evaluations that do not suck
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
how to Performance Evaluation
info
- *context: people ending up in management positions, figuring out how to manage*
- For feedback of changes write to tin@greenhost.net
Questions
- how to become more intentional about performance evaluation
- how about incorporating elements of teaching into PEs - educator backgrounds, bringing in teaching sensibilities
- what are specific challenges of a non-hierarchical org: hidden hierarchies, soft power dynamics etc
- how to get people involved in PEs? creating momentum and interest
- how to use PEs to surface under-utilized skills?
- what are good PE models?
- who defines your goals?
- How do you reset expectations and balance personal crises?
- what should not be in a PE?
Learnings
- core goal: **no surprises in PE**
- define core competencies**
- important to make time - PE is never prioritized
- creating and holding space for abilities and disabilities
- due to stigma, or lack of knowledge, people don't seek diagnosis
- explicitly expressing power dynamics is crucial. they are always present in PEs: they present risk of self-censorship, and carry implicit biases
- importance of transparency in process — for example, turnover without clarity damages org culture
- super important to set up expectations - baselining is key
- baselining evaluations:
- “What am I supposed to be achieving? How is success defined in my role?”
- how to communicate expectations well - to ensure understanding is aligned
- from each according to their abilities, to each according to their needs
- staggered evaluations, to avoid burnout
- personnel committee?
- board members, in charge of approving and reviewing evaluations and raises
- the importance of framing performance conversations in a positive manner: designing conversations aimed to help people succeed, instead of focusing on the negatives
Examples
- comparing self evaluations with evals of others, reflection and growth plan
- Board-led evaluation committees
- 360 evaluations
- EVAL TEAM EXAMPLE:
- two-people staggered process
- evaluations, self evaluations
- diff people are asked to respond to diff things: surfaces contextual knowledge
- person and their work buddy work on the plan together
- however, no incentives and no consequences: no raises, no promotions, no demotions, no firing
- once standards for project management were defined, no one cared about them anymore
- SHORT STANDING MEETING EXAMPLE:
- super regular, 20-30 long meetings
- creates a culture of mutual expectations
- Resources