Difference between revisions of "Collecting money online and offline for your efforts"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (1 revision imported) |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 23:37, 4 May 2015
- KEY TAKEAWAYS you can use multiple payment tools, but then your data is in a bunch of places and you may not even get all your donor data
- there's a need to entice donors, collect the data in one place and get the money in a simple, trusted way
- PCI compliance is scary
- recurring payments can be a pain
INTEREST AREAS AND DISCUSSION
- authorize.net - payment gateway
- good
- batching process. staff enters data in batches --> data verified --> inputted to quickbooks
- monthly donor program required lots of manual labor. getting in front of expiring credit cards. stolen credit cards. following up
with donors.
- crowdfunding campaigns and online payments
- paypal is not automated into CRM
- some systems keep donations more anonymous than we want.
- keeping in front of getting people to renew
- recurring billing
- IPN vs token system
- on site and offsite processors - lines getting blurred
- translating records into bookkeeping. PCI compliance.
- differences in functionality btw services
- collecting money through 3rd party services instead of direct
- want to learn better practices for fundraising
- artists and designers and artisans are always looking for payment mechanisms. practice on some systems before making recommendations.
- fiscal sponsors - challenging to raise money thru the
- subscriptions and memberships to sustain orgs
- what are the painless options
- supporting all the payment options, mostly recurring payments.recommending systems.
- security
- consumer-facing options
- tilt
- not using paypal
- wepay
- stripe
- offline payments
- auctions, events
- square, paypal have on-site swipers
- this can backfire. payment collectors won't share all the info you want + things like why the donation is being made
- asking for more info during donations
- drupal - ecommerce modules
- civi crm does it well
- braintree payments
- stripe
- focused only on transaction. seems to be a trend instead of monthly fees.
- network for good
- lets you paste a donate button on your website. they handle donations. they've contracted with the payment gateway. no monthly fee but higher transaction fees.
- just starting to offer possibility of integrating systems to it
for donor data.
- paypal complaints
- moving to other plans. hard to get data.
- seizing funds, shutting down accts without explanation
- razoo
- you can build your own page and make it fun. incorporates matching funds. good for recurring payments
- tilt
- can get payments as soon as goal is reached
- can set goal to $1
- authorize.net has a reseller network
- you have a rep who knows you, who can help solve problems. can get someone on the phone who doesn't work for authorize but has leverage with them
- rising fees are an issue. fees all of a sudden go up
- trend is to use a bunch of tools
- one tool for giving tuesday (free money)
- attraction of free money/rewards
- but it separates info out into five places
- there is a cost to free money. more complexity in operations. lost info that's not passed on to you.
- Kickstarter takes more fees but is so big that more people find your project
- 4-6 hours every other week getting network for good info into internal records
- use the right tools for the specific need
- website front end - entice people
- crm to collect the data in one place
- payment gateway to get the money
- how do you change the culture to make the donor experience seamless?
- being able to talk to support services
- people want to know their data is going to a place they trust
- people want a payment/donation experience that isn't confusing and is as simple as possible
- where can people learn about how to accept payments/donations?
- webinars
- asking people
- old tools aren't good. they're just the best of the worst
- language how do I collect donations/payments in my donors' native language? drupal or civi crm does language well. ask for what you need. ateways may not do multiple languages well
- collecting payments in different currencies
- newer companies limited (right now) because of credit card regulations throughout the world. can get money from overseas but there will be foreign transaction fees
- IATS. says they were founded for nonprofits but are owned by ticketmaster.
- PCI compliance
- data security rules
- you're liable if there's a data breach
- if you take physical credit cards, you have to implement physical security to prevent fraud and theft (of swiper and records)
- must verify that you're not storing credit card info on your servers or there are higher levels of expectations (audits)
- even if you're not storing the credit card info, you may not be in PCI compliance.
- omnipay
- standardized library for pmt gateways
- all you have to do is integrate with them and you integrate with all their payment processors
- puget sound sage did a great fundraising integration. they got real time info, used it for donor outreach, beat their goal by 2.
- recurring payments:
- recurr.ly
- there's another one that that integrates with stripe and checks for expire credit cards
- recurring echecks (authorize.net)